alg: (Default)
anna genoese ([personal profile] alg) wrote2006-03-09 10:34 am

(no subject)

Submission

A look at submission guidelines -- what they mean, how to read them, how to find them, and much encouraging to follow them.

[identity profile] joannemerriam.livejournal.com 2006-03-09 07:39 pm (UTC)(link)
Periodical editors have given me a whole range of opinions on this, from "that's a great letter, send it" to what you've said above. I remain confuzzled about what the right thing to do is - but I do think, if the magazine's posted guidelines say three months, and after six months I send a letter asking about my ms's status, and there's no reply, and then the one year mark goes by, then I need to be able to withdraw the material. I thought giving them an extra 60 days was nicer than pulling it immediately, on the off chance they were considering it.

This has happened to me four times (out of literally thousands of submissions, so it's not like it's common) and two of those times, the editor emailed me and asked me to resubmit. The other times I got no reply at all (one of those magazines turned out to have gone out of business; never did find out what happened with the other one, maybe I pissed them off).

I guess the difference between unsolicited novel submissions and unsolicited periodical submissions is that you can, presumably, submit your partial elsewhere while you're waiting for a request for the full (can't you? I've never submitted a novel), whereas I can't submit my poem/short story elsewhere until I hear back from them.

[identity profile] zhaneel69.livejournal.com 2006-03-09 10:10 pm (UTC)(link)
So you're saying you sent the 60 day deadline AFTER you've let it sit for the specified deadline?

That's a lot better than what I thought you meant by just saying 60 days for all unsolicted material.

And I can see that it would get a lot more positive responses.

Zhaneel

[identity profile] joannemerriam.livejournal.com 2006-03-10 12:09 am (UTC)(link)
Oh, jeez, no, I don't specify a deadline in my cover letter.

In all cases the journal in question was at least nine months past their specified response time, and hadn't responded to a previous query about my ms status.