Every writers' organization I've ever belonged to (SCBWA, SFWA, and RWA) has made some attempt to distinguish the pretenders from the real rabbits. I've never seen this succeed completely.
The point of PRO, from the members' point of view, is that apparently all the good solid debate and information is in the PRO-only areas. But "had one manuscript rejected" is a very odd definition of "professional".
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Date: 2006-04-05 08:27 pm (UTC)The point of PRO, from the members' point of view, is that apparently all the good solid debate and information is in the PRO-only areas. But "had one manuscript rejected" is a very odd definition of "professional".