Argh, annoying fallacies about bisexuals time. I keep worrying about getting that one from the other side. Both the hero's partners in the story know what he's like -- in fact they end up conferring over what to buy him for his birthday -- but there's still the possibility that someone will say he deceived the woman when he started seeing her. Even though she was the one who did all the chasing *and* the one that decided they were better as friends after an incident that had nothing to do with any current third party.
My other worry about the mainstream is whether my vague references to the age of consent situation in 1988 and the way Section 28 hung over everyone in education will confuse people who weren't involved in either reform campaign.
But this isn't an issue with bad writing; it's an obstacle evolving from the readers' own perceptions of, and problems with, the issue. It's sort of like, hrm, writing a book about a teacher/student romance and trying to make him sympathetic -- there are readers who will simply never ever see this romance as a positive thing because for them, teacher/student is Out Of The Question. It's much the same way with bisexual; for a lot of the queer world, the question of bisexuality hits some major buttons.
That said, there are bisexual lead characters (first off the top of my head is Tanya Huff's Henry), but they're really quite rare. When a reader says, "it's not you, it's me," it doesn't change the fact that this boils down to "I'm not buying it nor reading it." I suppose dealing with that is a personal decision in return, on the part of the author.
I'm obviously hanging out with different people to you -- well, obviously, you and mroctober are on a different continent to me -- I don't think the sexuality of the characters is going to be as much of a problem over here, so much as the fact that there's brief 'on page' sex with both genders (some of it in a historical context as the story deals with events from sixteen years before and how they affect the time period of the novel).
I did think seriously about whether the story could work with a straight protagonist, and it wouldn't, because there's not a big enough reason for his self-styled nemesis to get involved if they hadn't been lovers in the past. Equally the death he investigates would have less impact if the woman hadn't been the protagonist's supposed true love so I'm not making him gay. Nor am I copping out by ending the story with the idea that he'd been one or the other all along and that all his lovers of one gender had been just him trying to deny it.
Sorry, I thought I'd given up bisexual activism sometime in the 90's. Obviously not.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
My other worry about the mainstream is whether my vague references to the age of consent situation in 1988 and the way Section 28 hung over everyone in education will confuse people who weren't involved in either reform campaign.
no subject
That said, there are bisexual lead characters (first off the top of my head is Tanya Huff's Henry), but they're really quite rare. When a reader says, "it's not you, it's me," it doesn't change the fact that this boils down to "I'm not buying it nor reading it." I suppose dealing with that is a personal decision in return, on the part of the author.
no subject
I did think seriously about whether the story could work with a straight protagonist, and it wouldn't, because there's not a big enough reason for his self-styled nemesis to get involved if they hadn't been lovers in the past. Equally the death he investigates would have less impact if the woman hadn't been the protagonist's supposed true love so I'm not making him gay. Nor am I copping out by ending the story with the idea that he'd been one or the other all along and that all his lovers of one gender had been just him trying to deny it.
Sorry, I thought I'd given up bisexual activism sometime in the 90's. Obviously not.