Thanks for this great info. (Have you thought about presenting at a first-day session at the RWA conference?)
What do you think about pitching a reformulated manuscript that was received well the first time around (positive rejection on a full)? We're talking complete rewrite here, not just an edit and a tweak.
RWA has tons and tons of people presenting on stuff like this -- I'm sure they already have something similar scheduled. Additionally, this is the kind of thing that individual chapters should be going over with their members to prepare them.
Re: your question about pitching a ms...
Personally, unless I have requested changes, once I have rejected something, I don't want to see it again. I want the author to move on and write a new project and give him/herself some distance from the first project. Other editors may feel differently.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
alg
Thanks, and a question!
Date: 2006-02-24 05:13 pm (UTC)Thanks for this great info. (Have you thought about presenting at a first-day session at the RWA conference?)
What do you think about pitching a reformulated manuscript that was received well the first time around (positive rejection on a full)? We're talking complete rewrite here, not just an edit and a tweak.
Thanks again! T
Re: Thanks, and a question!
Date: 2006-02-25 02:34 pm (UTC)Re: your question about pitching a ms...
Personally, unless I have requested changes, once I have rejected something, I don't want to see it again. I want the author to move on and write a new project and give him/herself some distance from the first project. Other editors may feel differently.