P&Ls and how books make (or don't) money
Apr. 20th, 2006 02:05 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Profit & Loss/Profitability & Liability: How Books Make (or Don't Make!) Money
A basic outline of what happens when an editor buys a book and wants to publish it. This is very much a basic look at publishing and publishing finance, with some explanation of terms commonly used by the marketing and sales departments.
A basic outline of what happens when an editor buys a book and wants to publish it. This is very much a basic look at publishing and publishing finance, with some explanation of terms commonly used by the marketing and sales departments.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-04-21 04:00 am (UTC)There'll still be production costs, distribution costs, and that basic marketing and promotion that real publishers do for all their books no matter how small. There'll also be Contribution to Overhead, which is your book's fractional share of the cost of running the publishing house. If your book doesn't earn enough to cover those, you're still in the red no matter how tiny your advance.
Some years back, so long ago that alg (http://alg.livejournal.com/) was a cute little cartoon-watching moppet, there was grumbling about the very low advances being paid by one of the big trade houses.
As the authors and agents pointed out, if said publishing house honestly thought the book was only going to sell enough copies to earn out one of these pitiful advances, there was no way the book was going to cover its basic costs, and so they ought not be publishing it. But since they were publishing it, they obviously believed it would sell quite a few more copies than that -- and consequently they should have been offering higher advances.
Share the risk?
Date: 2006-04-22 04:32 pm (UTC)I'm sure this is not an original thought, and I'm also likewise sure there are a lot of authors would would view this idea with horror. Which leads to the question: does any publisher do anything like this? Would they consider it?
Re: Share the risk?
Date: 2006-04-24 12:06 am (UTC)Re: Share the risk?
Date: 2006-04-25 03:25 am (UTC)Like you, I was more interested in the getting published side than the getting paid lots up front side. However, you DO have to look at the distribution your chosen publisher has in place.
I'm published by a small press in Australia, but that small press has a distribution arrangement with Penguin, whose reps treat my book as one of their own outside my home state.
The publicist at FACP has been great with getting me exposure in the media, but I've also done my own bit by lining up a few reviews and cover blurbs. It feels like a collaborative effort, and that's how I like it.
Almost twenty years in small business (wholesale and retail) had me nodding my head at everything alg was saying. Books are products like any other - regard them as such and the whole crazy system suddenly makes sense.
Re: Share the risk?
Date: 2006-04-26 12:57 pm (UTC)wf
Re: Share the risk?
Date: 2006-04-27 12:24 am (UTC)I earnestly beg you not to do business with any publisher that offers you such a deal. While in theory they might be honest, in practice I've never seen nor heard of one that was. Proposals to share the risks are reliably a sign that you're dealing with a scammer.
Think of the worst books you've seen commercially published. Their publishers paid all costs. If a book were worse than that, do you imagine anyone would read it?
You can't share the risk. Your advance is only a fraction of the total cost. If the publisher has a real marketing, promotion, distribution, and publicity operation going, a genuine share of the risk would cost more than most people can imagine paying.